| 445 | 2 | 35 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
钟嵘在《诗品》中将曹丕列为中品,评价其主要作品"鄙直如偶语"。钟嵘的曹丕评价在后世被质疑。明代王世贞在《艺苑卮言》中以"小藻"代替钟嵘"鄙直如偶语"的论断,更以"本色"嘉许曹丕乐府诗,以为其诗应被列入上品。"本色"不仅指曹丕的乐府诗在题目、内容主题、情感基调、句式等形式特质上与乐府古诗一脉相承,更凸显出曹丕诗歌善于言情与汉乐府"感于哀乐,缘事而发"抒情特质的高度一致。王世贞的"本色"论指出了曹丕乐府诗在形式与抒情方面的特质,有助于更好地认识和评价曹丕乐府诗。
Abstract：Zhong Rong classified Cao Pi as a middle-class in Shipin,and evaluated his main works as " Bizhi". Zhong Rong's evaluation of Cao Pi had been questioned in later generations. Wang Shizhen of the Ming Dynasty replaced Zhong Rong's comment that " Bizhi " with " Xiaozao" in Yi Yuan Zhi Yan,and evaluated Cao Pi's Yuefu poems with " Bense",thinking that his poems should be included in the top grade. " Bense " not only means that Cao Pi's Yuefu poems are in line with Yuefu's ancient poems in terms of the formal characteristics of title,content,theme,emotional tone and sentence pattern,but also highlights that Cao Pi's poems are good at expressing feelings and are highly consistent with the lyric characteristics of Yuefu in Han Dynasty.Wang Shizhen's theory of " Bense" points out the characteristics of Cao Pi's Yuefu poems in form and lyricism,which is helpful to better understand and evaluate Cao Pi's Yuefu poems.
[1]钟嵘.诗品研究[M].周振甫，译注.北京:中华书局，1998.
[2]刘勰.文心雕龙[M].王运熙，周峰，译注.上海:上海古籍出版社，2010.
[3]王世贞.艺苑卮言校注[M].罗仲鼎，校注.济南:齐鲁书社，1992.
[4]朱彝尊.静志居诗话[M].北京:人民文学出版社，1990.
[5]毛先舒.诗辨坻[M].郭绍虞，编选.富寿荪，校点.清诗话续编.上海:上海古籍出版社，1983.
[6]闫霞.本色要求与体制之辨[J].山西大同大学学报，2012(1).
[7]吴承学，刘湘兰.乐府诗的演进与分类[J].古典文学知识，2018(4).
[8]崔豹.古今注[M]//丛书集成初编:0274册.北京:中华书局，1985.
[9]郭茂倩.乐府诗集[M].北京:人民文学出版社，2010.
[10]袁行霈.中国文学概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社，1990.
[11]沈德潜.古诗源[M].何长文，点校.长春:吉林人民出版社，1999.
[12]亚里斯多德.诗学[M].北京:人民文学出版社，1982.
[13]傅亚庶.三曹诗文全集译注[M].长春:吉林文史出版社，1997.
[14]陈祚明.采菽堂古诗选[DB/OL].[2018-10-17]. http://www. guoxuedashi. Com/guji/185428s/.
[15]王夫之.船山古诗选评[M].李中华，李利民，校点.上海:上海古籍出版社，2011.
基本信息:
DOI：10.16069/j.cnki.51-1610/g4.2019.09.003
中图分类号:I207.22
引用信息:
[1]王琴.子桓乐府谁人解，寂寞千年待弇州——论曹丕乐府诗歌的“本色”特质[J].乐山师范学院学报,2019,34(09):12-18.DOI:10.16069/j.cnki.51-1610/g4.2019.09.003.
2019-09-15
2019-09-15