| 146 | 1 | 25 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
"居丧不婚"作为儒家传统礼法,历代大多遵从此制,而两晋却常有"冒丧婚嫁"之事出现,并针对此进行过多角度、多方面的讨论。由于西晋"以礼制情"观与东晋"缘情制礼"观的截然不同,两晋士人对待"居丧婚嫁"的态度也是大相径庭。这种特殊的现象背后积淀着时人的社会心态,蕴含着不同的文化需求和文化观念,也影响到两晋文学创作发生转变。
Abstract：As a traditional Confucian rite, "not getting married in mourning" was largely followed in the past dynasties.However, "getting married in mourning" often appeared in the Jin Dynasties, which was discussed from many angles and in many aspects. Due to the difference between the western Jin Dynasty's stress on rites and the eastern Jin Dynasty's stress on emotion, scholars in the two Jin Dynasties had very different attitudes towards funeral and marriage. This special phenomenon embodied the social mentality of the people at that time, contained different cultural needs and concepts, and also influenced the conversion of literary creation in the Jin Dynasties.
[1]李学勤.周礼注疏[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999:68.
[2]陈鹏.中国婚姻史稿[M].北京:中华书局,1990:184.
[3]李学勤.礼记正义[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
[4]何休，解诂,徐彦，疏.春秋公羊传注疏[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999:285.
[5]钱大群.唐律疏义新注[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,2007:438.
[6]沈之奇.大清律辑注[M].北京:法律出版社,2000:261.
[7]杜预.通典[M].北京:中华书局,1988.
[8]邹远志.经典与社会的互动:两晋礼学议题研究[D].长沙：湖南大学,2010:247.
[9]房玄龄,等.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,2000.
[10]余英时.中国文化史通释[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2011:15.
[11]欧阳询.艺文类聚[M].汪绍楹,校.上海:上海古籍出版社,1999:722.
[12]罗宗强.宋代文学思想史·序[M].北京:中华书局,2004:8-9.
[13]游国恩，王起，萧涤非，等.中国文学史(修订本)：第一编[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2004:230.
[14]袁行霈.中国文学史[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005:43.
[15]逯钦立.先秦汉魏晋南北朝诗[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[16]贺贻孙.清诗话续编·诗筏[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983:153.
[17]许学夷.诗源辨体[M].北京：人民文学出版社,1987:52.
[18]范文澜.文心雕龙注[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962.
[19]严可均.全晋文[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999:257-258.
[20]宗白华.宗白华全集[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,1994:274.
基本信息:
DOI：10.16069/j.cnki.51-1610/g4.2021.11.003
中图分类号:I206.2
引用信息:
[1]叶珊彤.从“居丧婚嫁”礼法观念的不同看两晋文学创作的转变[J].乐山师范学院学报,2021,36(11):17-24.DOI:10.16069/j.cnki.51-1610/g4.2021.11.003.
2021-11-15
2021-11-15